Funded Trading Plus, Reviewed
The register check comes back clean for once: FTP London Ltd, 13719292, incorporated 2 November 2021 at 7 Bell Yard. Which forces the harder question of what a clean Companies House entry actually buys the customer.
This desk has spent the summer pulling the British branding off evaluation sellers and finding nothing underneath. Funded Trading Plus is the first in that run where the register answers. Worth saying plainly — and then worth asking what the answer is worth, because those are two questions and the sector prefers you conflate them.
The entry
Companies House lists FTP LONDON LTD, company number 13719292, a private limited company incorporated on 2 November 2021, registered office 7 Bell Yard, London, England, WC2A 2JR. Company status: Active. The last confirmation statement on the company record is dated 1 November 2025. Nature of business is given as SIC 82990, other business support service activities not elsewhere classified.
The officers register shows MASSEY, Simon Paul as a director, appointed on 2 November 2021, status active. All of the above was read on 6 September 2026.
A real company, at a real address, filing on time, with a named human attached. Against the Wyoming-and-Saint-Lucia arrangement this desk read last week, it is a different order of thing. Credit where it is owed.
What the filing evidences
Incorporation is a filing, not a permission. Anyone may form a company in London for a fee and a form; the register records that it was formed, that it files, and that it has not been struck off. It confers nothing on the customer.
Specifically, a Companies House entry evidences no authorisation by the Financial Conduct Authority, no segregation of client money, no cover under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and no route to the Financial Ombudsman Service. That is a description of what the document is, not a finding about this firm’s arrangements. This desk performed no FCA register lookup and therefore asserts nothing, in either direction, about whether any FCA permission exists here. Readers who care should search the Financial Services Register themselves rather than take a company number as its proxy — that substitution is the point of UK-flavoured branding.
The SIC code earns a line. 82990 is the residual business-support category, not a financial-services code, and it is the company’s own description of itself to the registrar.
The seam
The weak joint in this review is the one the firm controls. fundedtradingplus.com returned a Cloudflare block to this desk’s automated fetch on 6 September 2026 — status 403, “Sorry, you have been blocked”. That is not evidence the site is down; it blocks robots and serves humans normally. But it means the firm’s own footer, terms and imprint could not be read here — and those are the documents that would tie the brand to company 13719292 from the operator’s side.
The link comes instead from a third-party prop-firm comparison directory, which states that Funded Trading Plus is owned by FTP London Ltd and led by chief executive Simon Massey. The register corroborates in part: a Simon Paul Massey has been a director since the day the company was incorporated. Corroboration is not confirmation. Check the entity named in the terms at checkout against the number above before treating the two as one.
The figures this review does not carry
No profit split, no drawdown percentage, no account size, no fee and no payout total appears above, because none was read from a source of record. Search results circulate all of them. A number reaching you through a snippet, an affiliate page or the firm’s own banner is marketing until someone can point at the rulebook that binds it. The standing position here on payout totals survives a clean register entry unchanged: a self-published total is unaudited by anyone the customer can appeal to.
The same directory carries its own aggregate score, 4.6 from 2,516 reviews as displayed on 6 September 2026 — that site’s number, not Trustpilot’s, and such aggregates move. Recorded, not endorsed.
Bottom line
Funded Trading Plus clears the bar its British-sounding competitors keep failing: there is a company, it is in London, it has a number you can type into the register, and a director’s name is attached. That answers the identity question and nothing else. The product is still a paid examination marked in a simulator, the rules behind it could not be read here, and a clean Companies House page has never returned anyone’s money.
Put freshly: check the number before the marketing, then remember the number proves the seller exists, not that the sale is protected. These are paid evaluations, the trading is simulated, the risk of loss is substantial, and nothing here is advice about your money.